The Basic Principles Of h4831sc load data
The Basic Principles Of h4831sc load data
Blog Article
This is certainly designed to be the "head to" powder-or darn near to it- for just about any bottle-necked cartridge one particular could handload. It is actually the muse for so many pet loads, yet I have not been content with the outcomes.
They've got executed identically for me. Like Absolutely everyone else I rushed to obtain the more recent SC Edition but have now switched back again. Preferably you would like about a hundred% loading density. When you have enough case potential to the H4831(extensive) you're in all probability much better off.
The point that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is specifically why you happen to be observing bigger velocities attained with that powder, versus Anything you've found While using the IMR things. Also good powder, but to some degree improved suited to a little bit scaled-down situations using a bit significantly less capacity.
I've experienced a few rifles that fouled truly poor. Acquiring every one of the copper out was a real PIA till I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
INgunner54 reported: It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Observed a node and shot some groups.
WARNING: This solution can expose you to guide, which is thought to your State of California to lead to most cancers and start defects or other reproductive damage. For more info drop by – .
I am making use of it using a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 wasn't as accurate. RL22 did very well but I used to be slightly worried about temp balance. I think I'm at 72 grains and have all-around 2850ish fps
excaliber reported: I have observed the precise h4831 vs h4831sc opposite to become genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly exact powder in my three hundred Win Mag.
I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t content with the velocity. Soon after months, I got Fortunate and caught some H1000 on-line not to mention paid somewhat extra. The incredibly upcoming week at a gun clearly show a guy had a complete case of H1000 for $40 for every 1lb. I neglect the amount, but Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a delicate load.
The 55grs is everything I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I feel that they have got slowed down the swift to show that their rifles are greater. It bug the h4831sc hell outside of me. I realize improved. That is why I do not at any time throw out my older manuals. I do invest in new handbook on a regular basis to remain up on new chambers and there loading. I exploit this 39grs in summers @ 100+ degrees with no complications.
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, they're wholly unique powders, with IMR 4831 getting significantly more quickly compared to the Hodgdon variants. Really don't treat them as precisely the same powder, since they most undoubtedly are certainly not.
Of course, You should utilize the exact same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, although the SC Model may possibly let you get somewhat extra in cases in which you are maxing out situation volume While using the typical powder ahead of reaching tension boundaries.
rayporter mentioned: i never ever found a difference aside from the typical is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan. Click to expand...
I sawed a person in fifty percent to discover how thick the jackets were, plus they had been simply 2 times as thick for a 50-grain hollow point was. Ditto with the 64-grain Electrical power Stage, as these bullets are built for deer, not prairie pet dogs or woodchucks. You now know all the things I find out about h4831sc the 22-250 and slow-burning powders, and I do not know nearly anything in any way in regards to the 223. I doubt that you are going to get everywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know the way it goes.